<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ryan Saylor &#187; Ryan Saylor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ryansaylor.com/author/admin/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ryansaylor.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 06:29:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SNL: Sarah Palin Network</title>
		<link>http://ryansaylor.com/2010/09/05/snl-sarah-palin-network/123</link>
		<comments>http://ryansaylor.com/2010/09/05/snl-sarah-palin-network/123#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 06:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Saylor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saturday Night Live]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryansaylor.com/?p=1544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ryansaylor.com/2010/09/05/snl-sarah-palin-network/123/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Orly being crazy</title>
		<link>http://ryansaylor.com/2010/09/05/orly-being-crazy/123</link>
		<comments>http://ryansaylor.com/2010/09/05/orly-being-crazy/123#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 05:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Saylor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryansaylor.com/?p=1530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ryansaylor.com/2010/09/05/orly-being-crazy/123/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virgin America launches flights to Mexico</title>
		<link>http://ryansaylor.com/2010/08/31/virgin-america-launches-flights-to-mexico/123</link>
		<comments>http://ryansaylor.com/2010/08/31/virgin-america-launches-flights-to-mexico/123#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 04:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Saylor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryansaylor.com/?p=1496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Virgin America has announced service to two locations in Mexico. What other locations could be added in the future?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Virgin America has announced service to Cabo San Lucas and Cancun from their hubs in Los Angeles and San Francisco. It is yet another expansion for the newest and some argue coolest airline in the American air market. Other recently announced destinations include Dallas and Toronto.</p>
<p>What are some other likely destinations in the future? Based on previous announcements, Virgin would likely expand to other hub cities, such as Denver, Chicago or Atlanta before expanding to smaller markets. Markets likely to not be served include locations that have been monopolized to lockout value airlines, such as Memphis, who is not served by Southwest or Frontier and can only claim Air Canada Jazz and AirTran as value airlines.</p>
<p>My question is why doesn&#8217;t Virgin America establish a hub in a centrally-based city such as Denver, Chicago or Houston&#8217;s Hobby Airport instead of only having hubs on the west coast?</p>
<p><strong>FIND OUT MORE:</strong><br />
The Huffington Post: <a title="Virgin America Launches Service To Mexico" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/31/virgin-america-mexico_n_700687.html" target="_blank">Virgin America Launches Service To Mexico</a></p>
<h6>Ryan Saylor is the founder and managing editor of <a title="Midnight Politics | It's watercooler talk for insomniacs" href="http://midnightpolitics.com" target="_blank"><em>Midnight Politics</em></a> and the host of <em>Midnight Politics Radio</em>. You can follow him on Twitter <a title="Ryan Saylor (RSaylo) on Twitter" href="http://twitter.com/rsaylo" target="_blank">@RSaylo</a>.</h6>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ryansaylor.com/2010/08/31/virgin-america-launches-flights-to-mexico/123/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are eReaders worth it?</title>
		<link>http://ryansaylor.com/2010/08/25/are-ereaders-worth-the-it/123</link>
		<comments>http://ryansaylor.com/2010/08/25/are-ereaders-worth-the-it/123#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Saylor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryansaylor.com/?p=1485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[eReaders have become all the rage, but are they worth the price you pay?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sony and Nook both go for as cheap as $149. Kindle goes a bit cheaper at $139. And most books are about $12.99. But are eReaders and eBooks worth the price?</p>
<p><em>The Wall Street Journal</em> just looked at the differences between print and electronic format and came to their own conclusion: it&#8217;s not worth the price, yet. They gave many examples of books that were cheaper in physical form than in eBook format. But being an eReader owner, I have to say that the comparisons he was making aren&#8217;t the comparisons we, as eReader owners, look at. We&#8217;re not comparing the price of some cheaply bound copy of a book, we are comparing the eBook versus hardcover. I can&#8217;t tell you the last time I bought a paperback book. I always compare to hardcover because I would buy nothing else. I want my books to last and paperback just doesn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Now another issue that I&#8217;ve taken issue with in this article is this statement by writer Brett Arends:</p>
<blockquote><p>Amazon sells the best-selling e-book reader. It&#8217;s a great product, very easy to use–much easier, I&#8217;ve found, than the competition.</p></blockquote>
<p>When was the last time he actually did a side-by-side comparison? Because I have. And I&#8217;m not going to say which one is better, because as reporters we cannot ever be truly objective about that. Either you work with a company associated with one of the eReaders or you own stock in another company that sells it or makes it. So in other words, this writer should have just left that part out and just discussed the economics of the devices.</p>
<p>Regardless, the eReaders are a great deal if you are a hardcover book buyer, not so much if you just buy whatever copy is sitting on the table at the store. But think of the other things are you doing: reducing clutter, saving trees and being compact. And let&#8217;s not forget: saving money over hardcover books.</p>
<p><strong>FIND OUT MORE:</strong><br />
The Wall Street Journal: <a title="Should You Buy an E-Book? - WSJ.com" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703447004575449953277291226.html" target="_blank">Are E-Books Worth the Money?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ryansaylor.com/2010/08/25/are-ereaders-worth-the-it/123/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple event to be held September 7</title>
		<link>http://ryansaylor.com/2010/08/24/apple-event-to-be-held-september-7/123</link>
		<comments>http://ryansaylor.com/2010/08/24/apple-event-to-be-held-september-7/123#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 04:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Saylor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryansaylor.com/?p=1480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple is said to be planning annual event for September 7 where they could announce new TV show rentals and a redesigned version of Apple TV, according to CNET.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about you, but I am getting excited about the possibility of a new Apple TV coming to market. There has been talk for a long time that it would be in the works and now it appears that my dreams could come true on September 7 at Apple&#8217;s annual music event to be held in San Francisco:</p>
<blockquote><p>On Tuesday, in a story about forthcoming 99-cent TV show rentals on iTunes, Bloomberg reported that Apple would hold an event September 7.</p>
<p>&#8220;Apple plans to hold a San Francisco event September 7, two weeks ahead of the start of the new prime-time TV season,&#8221; according to the report, &#8220;to unveil the service and a refreshed line of entertainment products.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>What could the refreshed line of entertainment products include?</p>
<blockquote><p>Apple is also expected to unveil a $99 reworked version of Apple TV, new iPods, including an iPod Touch with &#8220;retina&#8221; display and front-facing camera, and FaceTime calling.</p></blockquote>
<p>I can&#8217;t even begin to express how excited I am that Apple is coming out with a new Apple TV. Hopefully it will be worth getting so I can move all of my movie and TV iTunes files from my MacBook onto Apple TV.</p>
<p><strong>FIND OUT MORE:</strong><br />
CNET: <a title="Report: Apple music, TV event to be held September 7 | Circuit Breaker - CNET News" href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-31021_3-20014615-260.html" target="_blank">Report: Apple music, TV event to be held September 7</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ryansaylor.com/2010/08/24/apple-event-to-be-held-september-7/123/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is housing still a good investment?</title>
		<link>http://ryansaylor.com/2010/08/24/is-housing-a-good-investment/123</link>
		<comments>http://ryansaylor.com/2010/08/24/is-housing-a-good-investment/123#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Saylor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryansaylor.com/?p=1468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The last few days have brought much interest in the housing market. New numbers came out showing that existing home sales are at the lowest levels in 15 years. And then there was this tidbit from The New York Times&#8216; David Streitfeld: “There is no iron law that real estate must appreciate,” said Stan Humphries, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last few days have brought much interest in the housing market. New numbers came out showing that existing home sales are at the lowest levels in 15 years. <span id="more-1468"></span>And then there was this tidbit from <em>The New York Times</em>&#8216; David Streitfeld:</p>
<blockquote><p>“There is no iron law that real estate must appreciate,” said Stan Humphries, chief economist for the real estate site Zillow. “All those theories advanced during the boom about why housing is special — that more people are choosing to spend more on housing, that more people are moving to the coasts, that we were running out of usable land — didn’t hold up.”</p>
<p>Instead, Mr. Humphries and other economists say, housing values will only keep up with inflation. A home will return the money an owner puts in each month, but will not multiply the investment.</p>
<p>Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, estimates that it will take 20 years to recoup the $6 trillion of housing wealth that has been lost since 2005. After adjusting for inflation, values will never catch up.</p>
<p>“People shouldn’t look at a home as a way to make money because it won’t,” Mr. Baker said.</p></blockquote>
<p>So what is the key to building wealth? Blogger James Kwak is subtly pushing his readers to invest in stocks and bonds:</p>
<blockquote><p>Housing is generally a worse investment than either stocks or simple U.S. Treasury bonds.</p></blockquote>
<p>So how can the wisdom that paid off for our parents and grandparents be so wrong? It&#8217;s a situation that is becoming more and more debated and will most likely not be settled for another decade after we have a chance to see how the housing market fairs. But I think it&#8217;s a little off to be telling people that investing in a home instead of paying rent is a bad idea (wait and if the housing market gets any worse, I might be singing a different tune a few years down the road).</p>
<p><strong>FIND OUT MORE:</strong><br />
The Baseline Scenario: <a title="Housing in Ten Words « The Baseline Scenario" href="http://baselinescenario.com/2010/08/23/housing-in-ten-words/" target="_blank">Housing in Ten Words</a><br />
The New York Times: <a title="Real Estate’s Gold Rush Seems Gone for Good - NYTimes.com" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/23/business/economy/23decline.html?_r=3&amp;hp" target="_blank">Housing Fades as a Means to Build Wealth, Analysts Say</a><br />
The Washington Post: <a title="Political Economy - Sales of previously occupied homes plunge" href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/political-economy/2010/08/sales_of_previously_occupied_h.html?hpid=topnews" target="_blank">Sales of previously occupied homes plunge</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ryansaylor.com/2010/08/24/is-housing-a-good-investment/123/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Technology breaks: are they good or bad?</title>
		<link>http://ryansaylor.com/2010/08/16/technology-breaks-are-they-good-or-bad/123</link>
		<comments>http://ryansaylor.com/2010/08/16/technology-breaks-are-they-good-or-bad/123#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 02:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Saylor</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryansaylor.com/?p=1445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was just reading this really interesting New York Times article on whether or not taking breaks from technology is a good thing and I am left wondering why this is even a question. It should be obvious: technology can become addictive and we all need a break sometimes. Don&#8217;t believe me? The best vacations [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="MacBook Pro" src="http://www.prlog.org/10666296-macbook-pro-repair.jpg" alt="MacBook Pro" width="552" height="181" /></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">I was just reading this really interesting <em>New York Times</em> article on whether or not taking breaks from technology is a good thing and I am left wondering why this is even a question. It should be obvious: technology can become addictive and we all need a break sometimes.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t believe me? The best vacations I have had are when I&#8217;ve gone to Europe and left the BlackBerry and MacBook at home. Then it&#8217;s just me and my trip and no distractions except good German beer and which museum to hit next. When I travel in the United States, I am constantly tied to my computer, never getting off of it. Whether it is checking my e-mail, writing my next article or working on something for my full-time job while on vacation, any time I travel anywhere in the United States, it&#8217;s like this. It&#8217;s not very peaceful and I feel just as exhausted as when I started my trip. That&#8217;s just how it is.</p>
<p>Now that&#8217;s not to say that a connection isn&#8217;t needed. It most certainly is. But when it&#8217;s vacation, that is a perfect time to unwind and get away from it all. We all should take a week or two every year to completely unwind and disconnect, don&#8217;t you think?</p>
<p><strong>FIND OUT MORE:</strong><br />
The New York Times: <a title="Your Brain on Computers - Studying the Brain Off the Grid, Professors Find Clarity - NYTimes.com" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/16/technology/16brain.html?pagewanted=1&amp;_r=4&amp;ref=todayspaper" target="_blank">Outdoors and Out of Reach, Studying the Brain</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ryansaylor.com/2010/08/16/technology-breaks-are-they-good-or-bad/123/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barnes &amp; Noble, Inc. considers sale of company</title>
		<link>http://ryansaylor.com/2010/08/04/barnes-noble-inc-considers-sale-of-company/123</link>
		<comments>http://ryansaylor.com/2010/08/04/barnes-noble-inc-considers-sale-of-company/123#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 01:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Saylor</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryansaylor.com/?p=1438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barnes &#38; Noble, Inc. announced today that they are considering putting themselves up for sale in order to help inflate the company&#8217;s stock price. It was a somewhat unexpected announcement that caught many off guard, including myself and other Barnes &#38; Noble booksellers. This from The Associated Press: The world&#8217;s largest bookseller said its board [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barnes &amp; Noble, Inc. announced today that they are considering putting themselves up for sale in order to help inflate the company&#8217;s stock price. It was a somewhat unexpected announcement that caught many off guard, including myself and other Barnes &amp; Noble booksellers. This from <em>The Associated Press</em>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The world&#8217;s largest bookseller said its board is evaluating several options to boost shareholder value in the face of a depressed stock price, including selling the company. [Company founder Leonard] Riggio, who holds some 17.9 million shares or nearly 30 percent of the company&#8217;s stock, said he&#8217;s considering joining an investor group to buy the retailer.</p>
<p>Shares soared on the news in after-hours trading Tuesday, rising $3.31, or nearly 26 percent, to $16.15. Shares closed the regular session down 98 cents, or 7 percent, at $12.84. The stock has been in free fall since late June, when the company reported a steep fourth-quarter loss and issued forecasts for first-quarter and full-year net income below expectations due to hefty planned investments in digital technology.</p>
<p>Barnes &amp; Noble has been hurting, along with other book retailers, as people focus on essentials in the down economy and limit their book purchases. Shoppers also are shifting away from paper books toward electronic books, much as they have done with music, moving away from CDs toward digital downloads.</p></blockquote>
<p>While it might appear to be a bad thing, it could actually be a good thing. After all, the company could always use more money to invest in digital technology since that is where the industry seems to be going. After all, that is the area I work in for B&amp;N and I would love even more money put into development so that it keeps me working.</p>
<p><strong>FIND OUT MORE:</strong><br />
The Associated Press via The Huffington Post: <a title="Barnes &amp; Noble May Put Itself Up For Sale" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/03/barnes-noble-may-put-itse_n_669541.html" target="_blank">Barnes &amp; Noble May Put Itself Up For Sale</a><br />
Barnes &amp; Noble Booksellers: <a title="Barnes &amp; Noble Booksellers" href="http://www.barnesandnobleinc.com/press_releases/2010_aug_3_bks_strategic_alternatives1.html" target="_blank">Barnes &amp; Noble to Evaluate Strategic Alternatives</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ryansaylor.com/2010/08/04/barnes-noble-inc-considers-sale-of-company/123/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spirit Airlines starts charging for carry-ons #AirTravel</title>
		<link>http://ryansaylor.com/2010/08/02/spirit-airlines-starts-charging-for-carry-ons-airtravel/123</link>
		<comments>http://ryansaylor.com/2010/08/02/spirit-airlines-starts-charging-for-carry-ons-airtravel/123#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 19:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Saylor</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryansaylor.com/?p=1434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spirit Airlines officially lost me as a potential customer today because they followed through on their incredibly stupid plan to start charging for carry-on bags. And they aren&#8217;t just charging a small fee, they are charging $45! Now I don&#8217;t travel a lot, but I travel enough that it would make a difference. Since January, I&#8217;ve [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_1435" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 170px"><img class="size-full wp-image-1435 " title="Spirit Airlines" src="http://ryansaylor.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/spirit_airlines.jpg" alt="Spirit Airlines logo" width="160" height="45" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Spirit Airlines logo</p></div>
<p>Spirit Airlines officially lost me as a potential customer today because they followed through on their incredibly stupid plan to start charging for carry-on bags. And they aren&#8217;t just charging a small fee, they are charging $45!</p>
<p>Now I don&#8217;t travel a lot, but I travel enough that it would make a difference. Since January, I&#8217;ve been to Seattle, Vancouver, Pensacola, and Tulsa. Addtionally, I am going to Kansas City and Memphis this month. So let&#8217;s figure up how much the checked bag fee would be for those five trips if I had flown each time: $270. That&#8217;s a round trip from my home airport to New York. WHAT A RIP OFF!</p>
<p><strong>FIND OUT MORE:</strong><br />
The Huffington Post: <a title="Spirit Airlines Starts $45 Carry-On Fee" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/02/spirit-airlines-carry-on_n_666937.html" target="_blank">Spirit Airlines Starts $45 Carry-On Fee</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ryansaylor.com/2010/08/02/spirit-airlines-starts-charging-for-carry-ons-airtravel/123/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>KWTV report inaccurate regarding Askins-Fallin match-up</title>
		<link>http://ryansaylor.com/2010/07/28/kwtv-report-inaccurate-regarding-askins-fallin-match-up/123</link>
		<comments>http://ryansaylor.com/2010/07/28/kwtv-report-inaccurate-regarding-askins-fallin-match-up/123#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 03:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Saylor</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryansaylor.com/?p=1426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a report that appeared on KWTV in Oklahoma City tonight, reporter Jennifer Pierce stated that the coming match-up between Lt. Gov. Jari Askins (D &#8211; Oklahoma) and U.S. Rep. Mary Fallin (R &#8211; 5th District, Oklahoma) is only the second time in American history that a woman to woman gubernatorial race has taken place. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a report that appeared on KWTV in Oklahoma City tonight, reporter Jennifer Pierce stated that the coming match-up between Lt. Gov. Jari Askins (D &#8211; Oklahoma) and U.S. Rep. Mary Fallin (R &#8211; 5th District, Oklahoma) is only the second time in American history that a woman to woman gubernatorial race has taken place. I hate to be the bearer of bad news to reporter Jennifer Pierce and the news staff at channel 9, but I accurately reported last night that this is actually the fourth time in American history that this has happened, and actually the second time this year alone. It has happened in Nebraska in the 80&#8242;s, Hawai&#8217;i in 2002, and it is happening in New Mexico and Oklahoma this year. You&#8217;d hope that a large television station in a top 50 market could get their facts straight, but I guess that&#8217;s too much to ask. Instead, <a title="Midnight Politics | It's watercooler talk for insomniacs" href="http://midnightpolitics.com" target="_blank">follow my small, independent web site</a>. At least I check my facts and provide documentation to back up my reporting.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><script src="http://www.news9.com/global/video/videoplayer.js?rnd=99540;hostDomain=www.news9.com;playerWidth=475;playerHeight=400;isShowIcon=true;clipId=4982815;flvUri=;partnerclipid=;adTag=null;enableAds=false;landingPage=http%253A%252F%252Fwww.news9.com%252FGlobal%252Fcategory.asp%253FC%253D116601;islandingPageoverride=false;playerType=STANDARD_EMBEDDEDscript" type="text/javascript"></script></p>
<p><strong>FOR MORE INFORMATION:</strong><br />
Center for American Women and Politics: <a title="Center for American  Women and Politics: Woman vs. Woman Fact Sheet" onclick="javascript:_gaq.push(['_trackPageview','/yoast-ga/download/www.cawp.rutgers.edu/fast_facts/elections/documents/WomVWom.pdf']);" href="http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/fast_facts/elections/documents/WomVWom.pdf" target="_blank">Woman vs. Woman Fact Sheet</a><br />
News9.com: <a title="Only Second Time in U.S. History Both Gubernatorial Candidates Are Women - News9.com - Oklahoma City, OK - News, Weather, Video and Sports |" href="http://www.news9.com/Global/category.asp?C=116601&amp;autoStart=true&amp;topVideoCatNo=default&amp;clipId=4982815&amp;flvUri=&amp;partnerclipid=" target="_blank">Only Second Time in U.S. History Both Gubernatorial Candidates Are Women</a><br />
Midnight Politics: <a title="Oklahoma to have first female governor | Midnight Politics" href="http://midnightpolitics.com/2010/07/27/oklahoma-to-have-first-female-governor/1983" target="_blank">Oklahoma to have first female governor</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ryansaylor.com/2010/07/28/kwtv-report-inaccurate-regarding-askins-fallin-match-up/123/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
